1～4 件を表示 ／ 全 4 件
Silverline Micro II
The smallest option in the Silverline family. With a footprint of just 45 x 13 mm, the Silverline Micro II enables reliable tracking of even the smallest assets, from IT and corporate assets to medical devices and tools. The adhesive is optimized for metal surfaces and painted metal surfaces.
Silverline Blade II
The Silverline Blade II boasts an excellent reading range of 10 meters (33 feet) on metal, despite its small footprint. While optimized for metal, the Blade also works on plastic and liquid containers. Industrial adhesives have very high initial tack and short curing times. For this reason, the Silverline Blade II is an ideal solution for industrial and IT asset tracking, as well as medical devices.
A label that combines an RFID tag and a protective overfilm for the surface.
This is a label-type RFID tag that combines a printed RFID tag with a protective overfilm. [Features] 〇 Protects the surface printing from external factors such as abrasion, rain, UV rays, and chemicals. 〇 Eliminates the hassle of double sticking, reducing the labor time for application by two-thirds. 〇 Delivered in a roll format with sequential numbering without any missing numbers.
![[Blog] Can RFID tags that are metal-compatible be read in any environment?](https://image.www.ipros.com/public/product/image/2cd/2000880735/IPROS17375028839555139140.png?w=280&h=280)
Recreating the actual office environment! A verification corner for inventorying company assets using RFID!
In the first round of verification, we found extreme results depending on where we placed the tagged chairs; sometimes they could be read from 10 meters away, while other times they could only be read from 2 meters. In the second round of verification, after placing tags in various locations on the chairs and scanning them, we concluded that to ensure readability regardless of where the tags are placed, one should choose "slightly more expensive metal-compatible tags" instead of "affordable metal-noncompatible tags." The theme for this third round is "Are metal-compatible tags really invincible?" In previous verifications, metal-compatible tags produced stable results regardless of the material of the asset they were attached to. But is that really the case? Could there be instances where "despite being metal-compatible, they couldn't be scanned"? Therefore, we will conduct tests while recreating an actual office environment! You can view the continuation through the related link. Please take a moment to read it.
